Discussion

Previous Parent Next Page


Major Sections

Site Map
Introduction
Health Economic and Reform

Health Informatics

Health Management
Information Management
Financial Management
Standardization

Quality Assurance

Business Intelligence
Examples

References

System
Team

 

**InHCc HMIS**
 

___________

Parent Pages

InHCc Consultants

___________

Sections Under this Page

Challenges
Stakeholders
Issues and Problem Determination
Quality of Care
Data and Standards
Patient Centric and Privacy of Infomation
Political Issues
Financial
Other Goodies
Safety
Workflow and Design
Demographics
Competition and Payment for Performance
Coding Systems
Client Problem List

 IntroductionProductsBenefitsManagementDiscussionSite MapReferences

Index

Introduction

I offer feel the need to express my views (which I have done throughout this web site) on something that I have recently read or heard concerning any of a number of topics. This page...until I have time to turn this into a real Blog...will be my platform...and I am not always current with what everyone else is thinking...In fact, people tell me that I am very opinionated....and this is a long section.

This page will present the general philosophy of this site. InHCc feels that it is important to give a hint of the direction that we are going. 

This project will be developed with the philosophy that without a good integrated Health Care Management and Information systems (HMIS) that is capable of operating at all levels of service; no other objectives can be met. Complex health services and solutions can only be provided to clients who need them at the time they need them if those managing and delivering the services have access to reliable, well-structured and timely information.

In all areas of Health Care Policy Reform, the attention is on the measurability and comparability of results. Administrators have become more aware of the need for information for policy formulation, implementation and management (WHO, 1996). Without sufficient and quality data, without effective and proper use of data, and without properly trained personnel, this measurability and comparability cannot be implemented…and…without the measurability and comparability of results, management cannot take place.

The growing complexity of healthcare services means that managers need greater access to information and better decision-making tools. Surveys have shown that existing management solutions do not completely address the issues of the accuracy and reliable of data, its time-variant nature, its usefulness to management, its security, or its cost.

Providing information and collaboration are core values in Health Care Services. Health care organizations at all levels need the means to manage their resources and put the right information in the hands of the right decision maker at the right time so that they can make informed decisions quickly and act promptly.

Without information, indicators can not be measured, targeted population can not be identified, health care services can not be evaluated, and processes can not be made more efficient.

What do we mean by Healthcare?

The Declaration of Alma-Ata was adopted at the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, 6-12 September 1978. It was the first international declaration underlining the importance of primary care The primary health care approach has since then been accepted by member countries of WHO as the key to achieving the goal of ‘Health for All’.

The Conference strongly reaffirms that health, is

a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, is a fundamental human right and that the attainment of the highest possible level of health is a most important world-wide social goal whose realization requires the action of many other social and economic sectors in addition to the health sector.

In 1977, the World Health Assembly decided that the major social goal of governments and WHO should be the attainment by all people of the world by the year 2000 of a level of health that would permit them to lead a socially and economically productive life.

In 1981, the Assembly unanimously adopted a Global Strategy for Health for All by the Year 2000. This was the birth of the "Health for All" movement.

According to WHO, "'Health for All' does not mean an end to disease and disability, or that doctors and nurses will care for everyone. It means that resources for health are evenly distributed and that essential health care is accessible to everyone. It means that health begins at home, in schools, and at the workplace, and that people use better approaches for preventing illness and alleviating unavoidable disease and disability. It means that people recognize that ill-health is not inevitable and that they can shape their own lives and the lives of their families, free from the avoidable burden of disease."

Let us look at this a little closer...What this clearly says is that "Health" is more than just an end to disease and disability. A level of Health should lead to a health of "health" that would permit them to lead a socially and economically productive life. It also clearly says that it should be the goal of governments. A very big mandate. But what it does not say is:

  • How do you define this level of Health or even health for that matter?
  • When is there enough health? Can we ever get enough of it?
  • What "resources are distributed for Health"
  • Who is going to provide these "resources" 

From our analysis, people in emerging and developing countries have different healthcare issues than those of the more advance countries. We feel that approximately 70% of the illnesses/problems come from social issues...sufficient quality food, clean water, sanitation, wars, and just plain bad government.

Our InHCc HMIS is heavily focused on the social and economic aspects of the client and his family. The InHCc HMIS places each individual into his family unit. All data is available both on the individual and the Household.

Healthcare is a Complicated Business

The descriptions and definitions given above makes healthcare one of the most complex businesses. It deals with everything that the human is...or can be.

While it may be impossible to descript the totally of this complex business, parts of it is can be descript and events are not entirely unpredictable. In fact, many events of humans are totally predictable such as when the birth of a baby will occurred and the pathway of many diseases. While procedures use to treat an individual's problems are constantly changing, the types of problems themselves change only very slowly.

Computers and Information systems can provide data....but these devices are "Tools"...it is the people that must make use of the data. Over and Over again in this web site will we stress the need for good managers...

You can have the best Information System that has ever been developed, but if there are a bunch of monkeys banging on the keys....nothing will come out.

We at InHCc believe that Healthcare Delivery is not any different that the delivery of any of goods and services (it requires good "business" procedures and monitoring and control) we are not going to step into the discussion of wither Healthcare is or is not a basic human right or wither it should be delivered by the Government or Privately or who should pay for it....No matter who is responsible for delivering health care or paying for it....the process of Delivering Healthcare is the same...You deliver it in the most efficient and effective way possible.

Today in all areas of health care applications the attention is on the measurability and comparability of results. Administrators have become more aware of the need for information for policy formulation, implementation and monitoring (WHO 1996). Without sufficient and quality data, without effective and proper use of data, and without the properly trained personnel, this measurability and comparability cannot be implemented. 

Surveys have shown that Management Information Systems (MIS) in vary considerably from one country to another. Most of these countries had to start from the very beginning or, worst yet, piece together parts of what they already had. Systems have tended to grow independently, on a small scale and not according to any plan. No one knew what the other departments were doing. This has led to costly and time-consuming duplication of work and redundancy of data. In many cases each department had its own “IS” personnel. In the past, each data piece was collected, summarized and passed up the hierarchy to the next level. In this hierarchical system each unit, department, or division had his or her special information needs. This lead to separate data files, separate programs, separate personnel and separate “systems” and only what summary information was passed up the system was available to the next level. In many incidents, personnel “made up” the data just to please the higher authorities. This leads to inappropriate allocation due to incorrect and misleading data supplied for use. Even when a particular “piece” of the MIS was developed, it was almost impossible to integrate it with other parts developed elsewhere independent of the others.  Absence of standards made it impossible to compare information within an organization much less across national or international boundaries.  

“The evaluation…indicated that in many countries some information is simply not available at central level because developments at local and community levels, such as in the areas of lifestyles and health promotion, are not always monitored centrally. Furthermore, it showed that international comparability of health information still needs to be improved through greater standardization of definitions and methods of data collection and processing (WHO 1996).

As health planning develops from a single purpose entity towards an integrated organization, information systems need to be developed so managers can have the flexibility they need to make informed decisions. 

Items of Interest

 

See Benefits

References and Links

[1] http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/declaration_almaata.pdf

Back to Top

Previous Parent Next Page

Parent Team Site Map Healthcare Management Benefits of an HIS InHCc HMIS Discussion References